Archive for: nadal

“Rafa – My Story” … a review.

Seeing as – dare I say it – Christmas is approaching, and you may be looking for a little something to put in a tennis fan’s stocking?  Well I thought I’d offer up a review of “Rafa – My Story”, the collaborated autobiography between Rafael Nadal and John Carlin.

First and fore-most I have to say that I enjoyed it.  I think as a piece of writing its well crafted and well put together.  Whilst its Rafa’s “autobiography”, there are several voices in there.  His own (re-counting largely the tennis match memories), John Carlin’s (re-counting his interpretation of Rafa’s other thoughts and memories) and that of some of his team, friends and family (with one notable exception).  Its central theme is the Wimbledon final of 2008, and the match flows through the whole book whilst it picks up and intersperses on other aspects of Rafa’s life along the way.  Because of this, its like structured story telling, but without the standard start-middle-end aspect of say Rafa’s young years, then teenage boy, to tennis champ rolling through each season from 2005 to 2010.  And for that, I liked it.

In keeping with biographies, largely they bring you a mixture of what you already know, along with some new revelations.  But this is Rafa – not Andre Agassi – so the revelations aren’t of a shocking or controversial nature.  But once you’ve got past that Rafa doesn’t like the dark, and that he doesn’t like dogs; that Mallorca, his family and his friends are central to him and to who he is; that he has to have his off and on-court rituals; that he likes fishing and football, we move onto the revelations, the first being something I knew about, but as it turns out, I didn’t really know about … Rafa’s real Achilles Heel.  No, its not the knees, its his foot.

The book reveals that he has a congenital problem and a very rare disease in his tarsal scaphoid (look it up).  Essentially this bone in Rafa’s foot failed to harden and ossify in childhood and has become deformed, bigger than it should be, and is therefore liable to splinter.  As it did in 2006.   It is managed by specially constructed insoles within his shoes to help take away the stress from that area and to this day, they are still working on getting them absolutely right to take away the pain.  And the by-product?  The price of angling his foot with an insole means that it puts stress on other parts of his body, and whilst the book talks about his calves and his back and doesn’t specifically cite his knees …  I think it alludes enough to it that they have suffered as a result.

But the stand out revelation in this book and what I found both shocking and illuminating …  is Rafa’s relationship with Toni.

Before I start giving my opinion, I do believe that they are the sum of two parts, intrinsically linked with the other.  And Rafa points out he loves him – several times – and that he credits his success to him.  But I found him to be a bully.

I find his methods excessive, shocking even, to a young boy – and even to a young man.  Its strange that he seems to have this mercurial standing in the family … but is the black sheep, the outsider, just ever so removed from them all.  And I truly believe that if he had been anything other than family, then they would have taken Rafa straight away from his charge.  And yet whatever they thought, (and even though some family members did think Toni’s treatment of Rafa was too much at times), they allowed it to continue because family trust over-rode everything else.  But when Rafa talks of the slap downs, the lack of praise, being picked out especially for criticism … I fail to see where this is character building and just believe it to be, well … abusive.  Rafa seems to have been told over and over that others are better than him, how so much about his tennis just wasn’t good enough, next to no praise but a heap load of criticism.  I found it painful reading that Toni called Rafa a “Mummy’s boy” … and yet in the book you have a statement from his mother where she says it pains her for the world to think that someone else brought up her own son.

And the one character within the Nadals that I didn’t particularly care for before reading this book, was Papa … Sebastian.  But I’ve changed my opinion simply because he has been so central in Rafa’s life by being the balancing out figure from whatever Toni was applying and so very important to him.

And I’m sure that people will say that without each other, they would not have been who they are today.  Now for Toni, I feel that is particularly true.  His “Mallorquin-ess” would have left him a simple tennis coach on the island, probably never making anyone a world champion, but mostly I believe that no parent would have allowed what he meted out to Rafa to happen to their child.  But for Rafa himself … I’m biased, maybe.  But I believe he would have made himself into some sort of sports champion regardless … whether as a tennis player, or he may have even found that calling as a footballer.  There just seems something inherent within him that isn’t put in there by Toni, his parents or anyone, that just makes him want to be competitive in sport and to succeed … a Champion.

I read that Toni has claimed not to have read Rafa’s book, and that’s probably true.  But there is a part within it where Rafa seems to be teeming tale, after tale after tale of incidents where he has had to suppress himself, put up and shut up, or just subjugate himself to Toni … and I get the feeling now that as a 25-year-old man, Rafa’s wanting to battle back, be his own man.  But one incident in the book during “Rafa’s Rant” is how, during the US Open 2010 after the Istomin match, they had a tumultuous row where Toni yelled at Rafa for not wearing his “Face”, and that he was too easily expressing his frustrations during the match … and Rafa fought back believing Toni to be so wrong in his judgement that it resulted in Toni stating that he would quit.  They obviously patched it up (and its not revealed how), but you do have to ask yourself as to the merit of that kind of coaching at this stage in his career … now that Rafa is the man, and a multi-Slam winning champion.  Rafa recalls that if he expresses doubt in himself, Toni will yell at him for his lack of confidence.  Yet he is the product of Toni’s DNA because if he ever expressed himself as better than his opponent, then Toni would have admonished him for that too.

After reading this book and with the gift of hind-sight in being able to see how the 2011 season worked out, Toni’s harsh, critical methods seem old hat to me now.  This constant thing of Toni’s in Rafa being told he’s not good enough, others being better, always instilling the fear of the opponent in him … well, its been entirely counter-productive this year, hasn’t it?  In my opinion, that relationship is at a critical point because actually its Toni that has to prove his worth now.  He shouldn’t be trotting out tat about Rafa’s game face being wrong … what he should be doing is earning his coin as a coach, and developing tactical plans and tactical measures for Rafa to employ to help beat his opponents.  In the book, its interesting that Rafa admits that he has no game plan against Djokovic, none.  He just hopes he can be the better player than him on the day.  Make of that what you will …

I think one of the most interesting things about autobiographies is the timing of their publication. There was a lot of bru-ha-ha when it was first announced that Rafa would be doing this book; you know, the usual stuff of how at his age and when he’s still mid-career, how could he possibly have a story to tell?  Well, I didn’t agree then because I felt Rafa has an amazing story of his rise to professional tennis player, to be the clay court King and then develop himself into a winner across all surfaces.  How in 2008 he won it all, to then lose it all in 2009, but then rise from personal and professional adversity to be the Champion and No. 1 player again in 2010 and the youngest ever to achieve the career Grand Slam.  But when John Carlin left Rafa in January 2011 just before the start of the Australian Open, I think the publishers thought that before the book was released, a magnificent, final chapter could be included … the RafaSlam … Rafa holding all Grand Slam titles at the same time, the stuff of legends.

But that didn’t happen, the story didn’t have that conclusion, and a very different twist in the Rafa tale occurred with the Djokovic rise instead.  But as 2012 approaches, are we to have one more final, glorious sequel in the story of Rafa Nadal?  Only time will tell …

Rafa’s book is a highly entertaining read and a well written book … so if you’re a fan, an appreciator, or just a general observer of tennis … I’d say that its a “must read”.   Go buy it, and enjoy …

Rafael Nadal withdraws from Paris-Bercy Masters

In a message announced via the social networks of Facebook and Twitter, Rafal Nadal today announced his withdrawal from the Paris Masters …

“Hi all. I won’t be playing this upcoming week the tournament in Paris Bercy. It’s been a difficult decision to take but I understand that it is what I need to do right now to prepare well for the end of this season and also for 2012. I hope I can be back in 2012 to that great event in the most beautiful city in the world, and hopefully try to win it once day.”

Interesting that there is no mention of a withdrawal for physical issues, so before going on to discuss whether he has made the correct decision, there’s one question which is needed to be explored first  and that is … can he?

Rafa is perhaps one of the most vocal of the top players when it comes to the length of the schedule and the mandatory nature of the number of tournaments to play.  For Masters 1000 series that number totals eight, and whilst he has already participated in that number to date, the Monte Carlo Masters as an optional event counts only towards to the required number of 500 series. Rafa needed to compete in Paris to complete the statutory number.   So if he’s not citing injury, how can he possibly withdraw without incurring a penalty?

The ATP rules state that a player’s Masters 1000 commitment can be reduced by one tournament if (1) they have played 600 matches following 1st January of that commitment year; (2) they have 12 years of service; or (3) they are 31 years of age following 1st January of that commitment year.  Well (2) and (3) are out for Rafa, and whilst I’ve known that the 600 match mark was coming, I did believe that he would only pass that milestone next year.  Not so.  It seems that Rafa has benefited from a little quirk in the rulings in that from 2010 onwards, only the ATP World Tour, World Tour Finals, Grand Slams, Davis Cup and Olympics count towards this commitment, but any Challenger or Futures matches played before 2010 do still count.  As Rafa played Challengers and Futures pre-2010, he exceeds his 600 tally for this commitment tour.

Au revoir Paris!

So whilst its sad for those fans who will miss out on seeing that great Champion there, is it the right decision for Rafa?  All things considered, for me its a resounding “yes”.  Indoor tennis on fast hardcourts has never suited Rafa’s game and he is least successful on them.  After a gruelling season where unlike his counterparts, Rafa has had to face the re-juvenated Novak Djokovic six (unsuccessful) times, a bit of additional time off to rest not only his body, but his spirit is perhaps called for.  In fact, it is very refreshing to to find that at this stage of the season, Rafa doesn’t have any injury woes because as he approaches his 26th year and 8th season in the top flight, keeping fit and healthy is tantamount.

With all that Rafa has achieved in tennis, I’m sure that he can rest easy perhaps never having his hands on the ever increasingly bizarre piece of sculpture that is the Paris Bercy trophy.  Working hard for 2012 is perhaps the best thing to do, along with positioning himself as best as possible for the World Tour Finals and perhaps the main singular personal goal that is left for Rafa this season … lifting the Davis Cup.

Rafael Nadal’s rumored outfit for Australian Open 2012

 

I found these pictures of Rafael Nadal’s possible outfit that he is going to wear for the Australian Open 2012. Love the colors!

Thank you Nev1.

Happy Birthday to Rafael Nadal from The Tennis Times

It was Rafael Nadal’s birthday yesterday, and even though we didn’t get invited to the French Open party I thought it would be nice to wish him a Happy Birthday. Cant believe he is still only 24 years old, makes me feel really old!

Nadal Out of Wimbledon and Roger Could Become Number 1

rafael nadal wimbledon

Rafael Nadal is out of Wimbledon and he stated it was one of the toughest decisions of his career. He has a huge amount of points to defend here at Wimbledon and this is really going to affect his ranking and could even give Roger Federer a chance to catch up.

Now that Rafael is out of Wimbledon he cant defend the 2000 points he received from Wimbledon last year thus meaning that Roger needs to win the tournament and gain his record 15th Grand Slam title.

Pro Ranking Graphs ATP and WTA

Here is a great way of viewing the top 10 players history. This graph shows ranking postion.  You can see the great progresss of Andy Murray, Where Nadal bumped Federer off the number 1 spot and Djokovic staying at number 3 the whol time in this graph. Click on the graph to follow the link.

Look at the fantastic struggle for the number 1 spot in the womens graphs !! 

Tennis World Rankings

The womens graph is much closer andthe number 1 position is continually changing. It appears Jankovic was number 1 for about 1 week.

Something looks strange about this graph.. Why? There should be a graph always at number 1 position. There does not appear to be a number 1 player before April ? I will contact coretennis and update this article when we get an answer.

This graph shows the exact points over time. It is intersting to see how far apart some of the ranking positions are from each other. There is a consistent large gap between 3 and 4 position. I wonder how long Nadal can hold the number 1 position !!

Schuettler Is In Wimbledon Semi, But Could Have Been Playing in Cordoba

Im currently sitting here watching Rainer Schuettler play Raphael Nadal in the semi final of Wimbledon and it really made me think about the tennis tours and levels of tours within the game. At the start of Wimbledon Rainer the 32 year old thought he was going to get through a round or two, and he was so confident that this was going to happen that he booked himself in for a challenger event in Cordoba. As it turns out he is now on center court in the Wimbledon semi final with a packed house watching him play, but if he did end up going to Cordoba he would have had 200 people watching him play, but only if he made the semis there. That also being said Rainer is going to receive a minimum of £187,500, but the Cordoba challenger has prize money in total of $100,000 but for all players.

So there is a huge difference between the level of tournaments, but the players arent really that different in level. Should there be a much smaller gap between prize money between tournament levels? Additionally, the ITF really need to think of ways to promote the sport, not just at the Grand Slam level, but more importantly at a basic tour level and also onto the Challenger and Future tournaments

Cordoba Challenger Results